VTI vs VOO Backtest
Over this window, 100% VOO had both higher CAGR and a smaller maximum drawdown than 100% VTI.
Assumptions
- 100% VTI: 100% VTI, rebalanced annually.
- 100% VOO: 100% VOO, rebalanced annually.
- Total-return prices (dividends reinvested), annual rebalancing, no taxes, fees, or cash flows.
Results
| Portfolio | CAGR | Max drawdown | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Calmar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% VTI | 14.5% | -35.0% | 17.4% | 0.79 | 1.11 | 0.42 |
| 100% VOO | 14.9% | -34.0% | 17.0% | 0.82 | 1.15 | 0.44 |
Growth of $10,000
Run it yourself
Open this exact allocation in the live Portfolio Backtest tool to change the date range, add cash flows, compare against other portfolios, or switch on tax-aware mode. Free to run, no sign-up required.
Open 100% VTI in the backtester Open 100% VOO in the backtesterRelated backtests
- SPY vs QQQ Backtest: 100% SPY
- Stocks vs Bonds Backtest (VTI vs BND): 100% VTI
- SPY vs 60/40 Portfolio Backtest: 100% SPY
- 60/40 Portfolio Backtest: 40% BND, 60% VTI
Back to all portfolio backtests
Historical simulation computed by the ArthaPilot backtest engine with total-return (dividends reinvested) prices and annual rebalancing, before taxes and fees. Past performance does not predict future results. This page is educational and is not investment, tax, or legal advice.